Obama Tells '60 Minutes' He Wants A Playoff
President-Elect Barack Obama has created quite a stir this weekend. First, his staff floats the idea of Sen. Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, one of the few people who would have the skills to save the department after eight years of neglect. Then, this;
"If you've got a bunch of teams who play throughout the season, and many of them have one loss or two losses, there's no clear decisive winner. We should be creating a playoff system," he tells CBS' Steve Kroft in an interview to be broadcast Sunday.
Now, relax for a minute about, "He's got better things to worry about!" You're right, he does. But, this is what a President does. George W. Bush had better things to worry about than making sure Christian organizations got federal funding, but he still pushed it throught out his whole term. Bill Clinton had pet projects as well (healthcare, interns, national lands). Plus, if President Bush called a 35-electoral vote win in 2004 a "mandate," then what is Obama's 204-electoral vote win? I think a landslide allows the guy to make statements about college football playoffs and what puppy belongs in the White House.
If Obama can convert college football to a playoff system, it will not win him any votes (although one of my Republican friends said he'd vote for Obama in 2012 if he got a playoff started). The fact that he keeps talking about it, including apparently thinking of how the structure would work, just puts him in the same place as every college football fan who wants to end the BCS. The difference is that now the most powerful man in the world is talking about it. Let's see the Big Ten and Pac-10 try to stand up to that.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Not sure about the "most powerful man in the world" bit...
but, if Palin was running for prez in ‘12, my first ever vote wouldn’t need much swaying (and I hate Libs). What’s Nader’s position on the BCS?
Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/
I Support the BCS.
Seriously, I do. Wholeheartedly, in fact. I’m not alone, either.
Here we go again: http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/
The perfect storm is the SEC winner in the BCS title game with USC or a non-division winner from the Big 12. If Penn State and Joe Pa are left out, after a history of being left out, expect a freak out in Happy Valley. And hell yes, I am rooting for BCS chaos. As long as UF benefits.
mlmintampa
UF C/O 06
Yep.
As long as the Gators are in, let the poo fly. PSU w/ 1 loss, TTU w/ 1 or 2 loss(es), OU w/ 1 or 2 loss(es), Texas w/ 1 or 2 loss(es), Mizzou winning the Big12, USC being high ranked w/o the Pac10 trophy, etc. would be freaking hilarious. Until someone suggests playing two of those in the NatChamp w/o the Gators. Then I’m going crazy on them.
Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/
Even more interesting...
Albeit unlikely, how about Florida and Alabama in the National Championship Game?
We beat them…the other teams collapse. That would be awesome having a rematch of the SEC Championship.
Worse than the 1996 Sugar Bowl.
Why have two teams that just played in their last (or second-to-last) game before bowl season?
Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/

by 























