Bowden thinks Ward > Tebow
Well I think the title says it all. Statistically, theres no sense in his argument. Both won a heisman, both led their team to a NC. All stats are taken from Wards two years playing and Tebow's Soph and Junior years playing. (Excluding freshman year to make it fair)
Passing wise:
Ward: 468-745 att, (62.8% comp) 5679 yds, 49 tds, and 21 ints
Tebow: 426-648 att, (65.7% comp) 6032 yds, 62 tds, and 10 ints
If that wasn't enough how bout rushing stats?
Ward: 889 rushing yards, 10 rushing TDs
Tebow: 1568 yds, 35 tds.
I don't get it. Am I missing something. I'll admit Ward was a great player, and amassed a crazy record as the starter ( i think it was 23-2 or something) but his number statistically dont match up.
5 months ago
silverstreak3k
3 comments
0 recs |
Comments
holy crap!
i agree, charlie was an amazing QB, but hes just rambling.
by lugowsky on Sep 10, 2009 3:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
it was his qb so ofcourse hes gonna be bias.
dan patrick was pretty much saying so wich qb would you start a team with…and he seemed suprised by him saying ward over tebow. they were both winners, but i think tebow wins because of his toughness and willingness to learn.
by Hook85 on Sep 12, 2009 1:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
oh and his size, maybe
ward didnt go to the nfl bc he was tiny for a QB and would have been murdered or paralyzed.
by lugowsky on Sep 15, 2009 10:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs













